Sunday, August 16, 2015

'The Japanese women who married the enemy'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-33857059

'The Japanese women who married the enemy

  • 16 August 2015
Seventy years ago many Japanese people in occupied Tokyo after World War Two saw US troops as the enemy. But tens of thousands of young Japanese women married GIs nonetheless - and then faced a big struggle to find their place in the US.
For 21-year-old Hiroko Tolbert, meeting her husband's parents for the first time after she had travelled to America in 1951 was a chance to make a good impression.
She picked her favourite kimono for the train journey to upstate New York, where she had heard everyone had beautiful clothes and beautiful homes.
But rather than being impressed, the family was horrified.
"My in-laws wanted me to change. They wanted me in Western clothes. So did my husband. So I went upstairs and put on something else, and the kimono was put away for many years," she says.


Hiroko Furukawa dancing in Japanese attire
Hiroko enjoyed wearing traditional Japanese clothes

It was the first of many lessons that American life was not what she had imagined it to be.
"I realised I was going to live on a chicken farm, with chicken coops and manure everywhere. Nobody removed their shoes in the house. In Japanese homes we didn't wear shoes, everything was very clean - I was devastated to live in these conditions," she says.
"They also gave me a new name - Susie."
Like many Japanese war brides, Hiroko had come from a fairly wealthy family, but could not see a future in a flattened Tokyo.
"Everything was crumbled as a result of the US bombing. You couldn't find streets, or stores, it was a nightmare. We were struggling for food and lodging.
"I didn't know very much about Bill, his background or family, but I took a chance when he asked me to marry him. I couldn't live there, I had to get out to survive," she says.
Hiroko's decision to marry American GI Samuel "Bill" Tolbert didn't go down well with her relatives.


Media captionImages of the devastation in Tokyo after they were bombed by the US in World War Two.
"My mother and brother were devastated I was marrying an American. My mother was the only one that came to see me when I left. I thought, 'That's it, I'm not going to see Japan again,'" she says.
Her husband's family also warned her that people would treat her differently in the US because Japan was the former enemy.
More than 110,000 Japanese-Americans on the US West Coast had been put into internment camps in the wake of the Pearl Harbor attacks in 1941 - when more than 2,400 Americans were killed in one day.
It was the largest official forced relocation in US history, prompted by the fear that members of the community might act as spies or collaborators and help the Japanese launch further attacks.


US soldier posting a Civilian Exclusion Order for Japanese-Americans. Photo courtesy of the Museum of History and Industry
US soldier posts a Civilian Exclusion Order for Japanese-Americans

The camps were closed in 1945, but emotions still ran high in the decade that followed.
"The war had been a war without mercy, with incredible hatred and fear on both sides. The discourse was also heavily racialised - and America was a pretty racist place at that time, with a lot of prejudice against inter-race relationships," says Prof Paul Spickard, an expert in history and Asian-American studies at the University of California.
Luckily, Hiroko found the community around her new family's rural farm in the Elmira area of New York welcoming.


Media captionSome Japanese wives attended bride schools to learn the American way of life and customs.
"One of my husband's aunts told me I would find it difficult to get anyone to deliver my baby, but she was wrong. The doctor told me he was honoured to take care of me. His wife and I became good friends - she took me over to their house to see my first Christmas tree," she says.
But other Japanese war brides found it harder to fit in to segregated America.
"I remember getting on a bus in Louisiana that was divided into two sections - black and white," recalls Atsuko Craft, who moved to the US at the age of 22 in 1952.
"I didn't know where to sit, so I sat in the middle."
Like Hiroko, Atsuko had been well-educated, but thought marrying an American would provide a better life than staying in devastated post-war Tokyo.
She says her "generous" husband - whom she met through a language exchange programme - agreed to pay for further education in the US.


Atsuko and her husband Arnold
Atsuko (second left) married Arnold (second right) and moved to the US in 1952

But despite graduating in microbiology and getting a good job at a hospital, she says she still faced discrimination.
"I'd go to look at a home or apartment, and when they saw me, they'd say it was already taken. They thought I would lower the real estate value. It was like blockbusting to make sure blacks wouldn't move into a neighbourhood, and it was hurtful," she says.
The Japanese wives also often faced rejection from the existing Japanese-American community, according to Prof Spickard.
"They thought they were loose women, which seems not to have been the case - most of the women [in Toyko] were running cash registers, stocking shelves, or working in jobs related to the US occupation," he says.
About 30,000 to 35,000 Japanese women migrated to the US during the 1950s, according to Spickard.
At first, the US military had ordered soldiers not to fraternise with local women and blocked requests to marry.


Hiroko Tolbert an her former husband Samuel Tolbert
Hiroko married American GI Samuel 'Bill' Tolbert in Japan, and moved to the US in 1951

The War Brides Act of 1945 allowed American servicemen who married abroad to bring their wives home, but it took the Immigration Act of 1952 to enable Asians to come to America in large numbers.
When the women did move to the US, some attended Japanese bride schools at military bases to learn how to do things like bake cakes the American way, or walk in heels rather than the flat shoes to which they were accustomed.
But many were totally unprepared.
Generally speaking, the Japanese women that married black Americans settled more easily, Spickard says.


Japanese woman learning how to bake a cake
Some Japanese wives went to bride schools to learn how to live the American way

"Black families knew what it was like to be on the losing side. They were welcomed by the sisterhood of black women. But in small white communities in places like Ohio and Florida, their isolation was often extreme."
Atsuko, now 85, says she noticed a big difference between life in Louisiana and Maryland, near Washington DC, where she raised her two children and still lives with her husband.
And she says times have changed, and she does not experience any prejudice now.
"America is more worldly and sophisticated. I feel like a Japanese American, and I'm happy with that," she says.


Media captionTwo Japanese war brides, who married US serviceman after the end of World War Two, recall the struggle to find their place in the US.
Hiroko agrees that things are different. But the 84-year-old, who divorced Samuel in 1989 and has since remarried, thinks she has changed as much as America.
"I learned to be less strict with my four children - the Japanese are disciplined and schooling is very important, it was always study, study, study. I saved money and became a successful store owner. I finally have a nice life, a beautiful home.
"I have chosen the right direction for my life - I am very much an American," she says.
But there is no Susie any more. Only Hiroko.'
The full documentary Fall Seven Times, Get Up Eight will air on BBC World News this weekend. Click to see the schedule.

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

'Frances Kelsey, Doctor Who Saved The U.S. From Thalidomide, Dies At 101'

Frances Kelsey, Doctor Who Saved The U.S. From Thalidomide, Dies At 101


August 10, 2015 | by Aamna Mohdin

Photo credit: Frances Kelsey. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration via Wikimedia Commons
Frances Oldham Kelsey has been described as a hero, and for good reason. The Canadian-born doctor saved the U.S. from thalidomide – the dangerous drug that caused thousands of babies to be born with malformed limbs and countless more miscarriages.
Thalidomide was being used during the 1950s in Europe to treat insomnia and morning sickness in pregnant women. But when the drug reached the Food and Drug Administration in September 1960, Frances Kelsey – the new medical officer – was skeptical about its safety. Kelsey requested further information from the manufacturer and, despite significant pressure and complaints, persevered with her enquiry.
Her persistence paid off as evidence against thalidomide began pouring in. Thousands of babies whose mothers took the drug were born with flipper-like arms and legs, missing limbs and organs and other birth defects. Kelsey's refusal to approve thalidomide saved countless children from being born with birth defects associated with the drug. A number of lawsuits have been filed against thalidomide worldwide, which include recent bids from victims for compensation from manufacturers.
Kelsey, who died on Friday at the age of 101, helped improve the regulatory procedure for approving pharmaceutical drugs. CBC Canada reports that while thousands were affected in Europe, only 17 children were born with thalidomide-related defects in the U.S.
New legislation following the thalidomide disaster tightened regulations and gave more power to the FDA over drug testing. As the The Washington Post explains, the new regulations forced pharmaceutical companies to conduct phased clinical trials, to be honest about adverse effects and make sure participants give informed consent during drug testing. The law is still in force today.
Kelsey was awarded the Distinguished Federal Civilian Service by President John F. Kennedy. During the White House ceremony, Kennedy, according to The New York Times, said: “Her exceptional judgment in evaluating a new drug for safety for human use has prevented a major tragedy of birth deformities in the United States.”
Just 24 hours before her death, Kelsey was presented with the Order of Canada in a private ceremony. "We knew that death was imminent, and I sat beside her bed, held her hand, told her why I was there and why it was so important that we have the opportunity to recognize her, and took the medal and had an opportunity to put it in her hands," Elizabeth Dowdeswell, lieutenant governor of Ontario, told CBC Canada.

http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/frances-kelsey-who-saved-us-thalidomide-dies-101

Monday, July 13, 2015

on why there is more to doing, than time management

http://qz.com/447193/time-management-is-only-making-our-busy-lives-worse/

'TICK. TOCK.

Time management is only making our busy lives worse


“Tess…started her way up the dark and crooked lane not made for hasty progress; a street laid out before inches of land had value, and when one-handed clocks sufficiently sub-divided the day.” —Thomas Hardy

Imagine your life without time, without a constant sense that you’re running behind, frustrated that yet again you are losing the battle against the irresistible force of the ticking clock. Imagine not wishing there were more hours in the day.

We haven’t always been obsessed with time. In fact, as the historian E.P. Thompson highlighted half a century ago, before the Industrial Revolution clocks were largely irrelevant. Instead of a time orientation, people had a task orientation. They had jobs to do, and so they did them in the natural order, at the natural time. This worked for a largely agricultural society. However, the factories of the Industrial Revolution needed to coordinate hundreds of people to get them working at the same time, in synchronicity—and that required clocks. So business leaders imposed clock time on their workforce (not without resistance), and eminent leaders, such as Benjamin Franklin, reinforced the value of this with statements like “time is money.”
Cast the clock forward 250 years, and we’re all obsessed with time. We don’t need managers to impose time discipline upon us—we do it ourselves because we’re so busy. It seems the only option in the face of the demand-and-expectation tsunami hitting us each day. So we schedule and cram our time, squeezing all the efficiency we can out of each day. Time management, we believe, is the solution to our busyness: if we could organize our time better, we’d be less overwhelmed, happier, and more effective. We are completely wrong on all three counts, and it’s damaging our lives and our careers.

Time management only makes you busier

Research does show that if you increase people’s time awareness—by placing a big clock in front of them, for example—they do more stuff(think about how much work you get done on the last day before your holiday). It makes logical sense that, by getting more done, we’d be likely to feel more in control. More than that, it is one of the great fantasies of time management: if you get more organized, you will get on top. However, that only works in a finite world. We haven’t lived in that world for quite a while. In our infinite world, we will never be able to get on top of everything, ever again; there is just too much to do. In Greek mythology, when you cut off one of Hydra’s heads, two would grow back. Like with the Hydra, when we complete more tasks, all that happens is more appear to take their place—send more emails, get more replies. In essence, if we do more as a result of better managing our time, we don’t get it all done—we just become busier.

Maximizing your time means fracturing your attention

Armed with gadgets, we have never been better equipped to “maximize our time.” Our ever-present phones allow us to fill all our time productively, to communicate in real-time, and to juggle multiple tasks, swatting away incoming demands like some super-charged task-ninja, potent and efficient. As we seek to maximize our time, we slice and dice it into ever-smaller increments. This leads to what Brigid Schulte calls time-confetti; however, the real impact isn’t on our time, but on our attention. When we scatter our attention across a thousand micro-activities, we prevent ourselves from engaging deeply or thinking properly.

Life-enhancing conversations with loved ones are disemboweled with frequent “productive” glances at the inbox; our ability to think is decimated by the distraction of the ping and the ring. We maintain a state of chaotic mental activity that Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi callspsychic entropy. This is the opposite of the optimal psychological state of flow, where attention is allowed to linger, to sink into an activity without distraction, where we bring our thoughts, actions, and goals into perfect synchronicity for extended periods. Flow doesn’t happen in splinters of time, but in great big lumps of attention. Think about your last few weeks. All the moments you had of real insight or happiness came from times when you sank your attention, with reckless abandon, into the moment and the activity. In fact, one of the very features of flow is a loss of the sense of time. In maximizing our time, we rob our moments of their color.

Time awareness makes us less effective

Having heard all this you may still be thinking that you’d be willing to feel busier and less happy as long as you could be effective. Unfortunately, time management hinders our performance in this area too. Effectiveness comes from two core abilities: prioritization and achievement. When we prioritize well, we choose to do the right things, not just the obvious things. Yet when we have a strong time awareness, our attention narrows and our ability to make good choices declines. We make decisions based on the immediate demand, rather than zooming out to look at the bigger picture. We prioritize the urgent and immediate, rather than the important and strategic. In our time-driven frenzy, our gaze seldom lifts from things like the inbox and task list. Research by Microsoft, for example, suggests that 77% of UK workersfeel they have had a productive day if they have emptied their inbox. It constantly horrifies me to see the number of blogs and books which focus on the goal of getting to an empty inbox or zero tasks, as if either achievement was worthwhile. No business or life was changed by an empty inbox and anyone who gets to zero tasks simply lacks imagination!

In addition to making bad choices, research by Michael DeDonno and Heath Demaree shows that perceived time pressure lowers our ability to achieve as well. They found that the very sense of a lack of time—rather than an actual lack of time—reduces our performance. Teresa Amabile of Harvard has also shown that increased time-focus reduces our problem solving ability, and our capacity to generate imaginative solutions. We think less well when we work under the shadow of the clock.

The end of the time management era

It is true: we will be able to do more stuff if we focus on managing our time, but in today’s business environment, we don’t need more repetitive, synchronized activity like we did in the Industrial Revolution. We need more thinking, more creativity, and more problem solving. A focus on time will undermine all of these. It will make you feel more overwhelmed and miserable too! Time management was a brilliant invention, and helped to transform society 250 years ago. It is just not helpful anymore; in fact it’s harmful in a world of too much. It’s time to develop a different strategy—one that starts from the recognition that, in our overloaded world, the greatest shortage is nottime, but attention. Put another way; time is no longer money.

Follow Tony on Twitter @tonycrabbe. We welcome your comments atideas@qz.com.'

Saturday, July 11, 2015

'Medicating Women’s Feelings'

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/03/01/opinion/sunday/medicating-womens-feelings.html?referrer=&_r=2

'WOMEN are moody. By evolutionary design, we are hard-wired to be sensitive to our environments, empathic to our children’s needs and intuitive of our partners’ intentions. This is basic to our survival and that of our offspring. Some research suggests that women are often better at articulating their feelings than men because as the female brain develops, more capacity is reserved for language, memory, hearing and observing emotions in others.
These are observations rooted in biology, not intended to mesh with any kind of pro- or anti-feminist ideology. But they do have social implications. Women’s emotionality is a sign of health, not disease; it is a source of power. But we are under constant pressure to restrain our emotional lives. We have been taught to apologize for our tears, to suppress our anger and to fear being called hysterical.
The pharmaceutical industry plays on that fear, targeting women in a barrage of advertising on daytime talk shows and in magazines. More Americans are on psychiatric medications than ever before, and in my experience they are staying on them far longer than was ever intended. Sales of antidepressants and antianxiety meds have been booming in the past two decades, and they’ve recently been outpaced by an antipsychotic, Abilify, that is the No. 1 seller among all drugs in the United States, not just psychiatric ones.
As a psychiatrist practicing for 20 years, I must tell you, this is insane.
At least one in four women in America now takes a psychiatric medication, compared with one in seven men. Women are nearly twice as likely to receive a diagnosis of depression or anxiety disorder than men are. For many women, these drugs greatly improve their lives. But for others they aren’t necessary. The increase in prescriptions for psychiatric medications, often by doctors in other specialties, is creating a new normal, encouraging more women to seek chemical assistance. Whether a woman needs these drugs should be a medical decision, not a response to peer pressure and consumerism.
The new, medicated normal is at odds with women’s dynamic biology; brain and body chemicals are meant to be in flux. To simplify things, think of serotonin as the “it’s all good” brain chemical. Too high and you don’t care much about anything; too low and everything seems like a problem to be fixed.

In the days leading up to menstruation, when emotional sensitivity is heightened, women may feel less insulated, more irritable or dissatisfied. I tell my patients that the thoughts and feelings that come up during this phase are genuine, and perhaps it’s best to re-evaluate what they put up with the rest of the month, when their hormone and neurotransmitter levels are more likely programmed to prompt them to be accommodating to others’ demands and needs.
The most common antidepressants, which are also used to treat anxiety, are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (S.S.R.I.s) that enhance serotonin transmission. S.S.R.I.s keep things “all good.” But too good is no good. More serotonin might lengthen your short fuse and quell your fears, but it also helps to numb you, physically and emotionally. These medicines frequently leave women less interested in sex. S.S.R.I.s tend to blunt negative feelings more than they boost positive ones. On S.S.R.I.s, you probably won’t be skipping around with a grin; it’s just that you stay more rational and less emotional. Some people on S.S.R.I.s have also reported less of many other human traits: empathy, irritation, sadness, erotic dreaming, creativity, anger, expression of their feelings, mourning and worry.
Obviously, there are situations where psychiatric medications are called for. The problem is too many genuinely ill people remain untreated, mostly because of socioeconomic factors. People who don’t really need these drugs are trying to medicate a normal reaction to an unnatural set of stressors: lives without nearly enough sleep, sunshine, nutrients, movement and eye contact, which is crucial to us as social primates.
If the serotonin levels of women are constantly, artificially high, they are at risk of losing their emotional sensitivity with its natural fluctuations, and modeling a more masculine, static hormonal balance. This emotional blunting encourages women to take on behaviors that are typically approved by men: appearing to be invulnerable, for instance, a stance that might help women move up in male-dominated businesses. Primate studies show that giving an S.S.R.I. can augment social dominance behaviors, elevating an animal’s status in the hierarchy.
But at what cost? I had a patient who called me from her office in tears, saying she needed to increase her antidepressant dosage because she couldn’t be seen crying at work. After dissecting why she was upset — her boss had betrayed and humiliated her in front of her staff — we decided that what was needed was calm confrontation, not more medication.
Medical chart reviews consistently show that doctors are more likely to give women psychiatric medications than men, especially women between the ages of 35 and 64. For some women in that age group the symptoms of perimenopause can sound a lot like depression, and tears are common. Crying isn’t just about sadness. When we are scared, or frustrated, when we see injustice, when we are deeply touched by the poignancy of humanity, we cry. And some women cry more easily than others. It doesn’t mean we’re weak or out of control. At higher doses, S.S.R.I.s make it difficult to cry. They can also promote apathy and indifference. Change comes from the discomfort and awareness that something is wrong; we know what’s right only when we feel it. If medicated means complacent, it helps no one.
When we are overmedicated, our emotions become synthetic. For personal growth, for a satisfying marriage and for a more peaceful world, what we need is more empathy, compassion, receptivity, emotionality and vulnerability, not less.
We need to stop labeling our sadness and anxiety as uncomfortable symptoms, and to appreciate them as a healthy, adaptive part of our biology.'


professional attire

http://www.umsl.edu/depts/career/files/pdfs/Professional%20Dress%20Handout.pdf

http://www.career.vt.edu/interviewing/interviewappearance.html

https://www.ndsu.edu/career/dress_to_impress/

http://www.sbu.edu/docs/default-source/life-at-sbu-documents/professional-wardrobe-nbsp-.pdf?sfvrsn=0

http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2009_06_19/caredit.a0900077

https://www.hartford.edu/career_services/files/pdf/dress_women.pdf

https://www.careereducation.columbia.edu/resources/tipsheets/skills-professional-image

http://as.cornell.edu/academics/careers/networking/upload/DressforSuccess-1.pdf

http://uk.businessinsider.com/how-to-dress-for-work-business-attire-2014-8

http://www.business.umt.edu/Portals/0/docs/Career%20Development/WomensBusinessProfessionalInterviewAttire.pdf

https://www.creighton.edu/careercenter/students/interviewtips/professionaletiquettetips/professionaldressforwomen/

http://www.engr.psu.edu/career/Students/interviewing/attire.aspx

http://www.moi-meme.com/guide-to-professional-attire-for-women/

http://www.usfsp.edu/career/files/2015/01/dress-code-career-fair-New-Dec-14.pdf


https://www.ndsu.edu/career/dress_for_success/

http://cse.ksu.edu/files/cse/img-150112090957.pdf

http://career.opcd.wfu.edu/practice-for-an-interview/interview-attire/

http://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/~/media/Files/MSB/Student-Orgs/Diversity%20Council/F12_-_Instructional_Guide_-_Business_Attire.pdf

http://jezebel.com/5512638/dress-code-how-to-dress-for-work

https://career.berkeley.edu/Callisto/RecrAttire

http://happygolegal.com/2012/05/put-your-best-foot-forward-professional-attire-simplified-for-summer-associates/#.VaEUJ_lViko

http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/perspectives_magazine/2010_fall_order_in_closet.authcheckdam.pdf

http://womanofscience.com/tag/professional-attire/

http://www.southwestern.edu/live/files/1472-business-attire-resource-guide

http://mmlafleur.com/mdash

http://www.bluesuitsonline.com/interview_suit-guide.html



General career advice
http://www.umsl.edu/depts/career/Career%20Tools/index.html

http://career.opcd.wfu.edu/practice-for-an-interview/interview-attire/

Saudi Satire Show

https://uk.tv.yahoo.com/saudi-tv-show-becomes-hit-mocking-islamic-state-154548208.html

Saudi TV show becomes a hit by mocking Islamic State group


DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — A new TV satire program has become a hit in the Arab world by mocking some of the region's most serious issues, from the intractable Sunni-Shiite divide and religious extremism to the brutality of militants like the Islamic State group.
The show, "Selfie," has also brought a backlash. Islamic State group sympathizers have made death threats against its Saudi star and top writer on social media. One mainstream Saudi cleric denounced the show of heresy for mocking the country's ultraconservative religious establishment. That has made it the buzz of the current Muslim holy month of Ramadan, which is the peak television viewing season in the Middle East.
Naser al-Qasabi, the series' star, and its writer Khalaf al-Harbi told The Associated Press in their first interview with foreign media that they expected the backlash, but weren't prepared for the popularity. It's one of the top shows on MBC, the privately owned Saudi network that airs it, and has been the talk of the Gulf press.
Al-Qasabi says the series' dark humor reveals just how tragic the situation across the Middle East has become.
"What's coming is darker," he said. "Maybe I am a bit pessimistic, and I hope that I am wrong, but I don't think I am."
In one of the show's episodes, al-Qasabi plays a would-be "caliph" starting his own Islamic State group-style militia, but he's surrounded by buffoons and hypocrites. His "mufti," or top cleric, never finished school. He struggles to find ways to differentiate his group — his group's flag is the same as IS's notorious banner but with the black and white colors flipped. When one of his cronies boasts of plans for a mass beheading, the "caliph" complains that he wants a new form of execution.
"Behead, behead, behead. That's all you got?" he groans, before suggesting the captives be put in a freezer. It's particularly bitter humor, given the increasingly grisly ways IS has used to kill its captives.
In the show's most popular skit, al-Qasabi plays a Saudi father whose son has run off to join IS. He smuggles himself into Syria, pretends to be a jihadi joining IS and tries to convince his son to return home. It's a more serious episode, showing his horror at IS "perversions" of Islam and at the group's atrocities — and his torment as he tries to avoid committing atrocities himself in his disguise. But it has comic moments as well, as he fumbles his way through militant training and is chased around the bed by a militant bride who is forced on him by the group and who has dedicated her life to pleasing jihadis as a means of going to heaven.
Other, lower-budget Iraqi and Syrian TV shows have mocked IS and other militants. But "Selfie" stands out with its high production values — and the fact that it's a show with Saudi actors on a Saudi network at times mocking attitudes on religion in the kingdom, where there is little tolerance for discussing the many taboos.
In one episode, two Saudi men meet at an airport in Europe and bond over their love of women, alcohol and hard partying. But, though neither is religious, their budding friendship takes a nosedive when they discover that one is Sunni and the other Shiite. They argue until airport security detains them. When police discover they are fighting over a split that happened 1,400 years ago, they send the two a mental hospital.
Another skit lampooned Saudi Arabia's powerful ultraconservative religious establishment and its stance against music. That was the show that prompted cleric Saeed bin Mohammed bin Farwa to accuse al-Qasabi and MBC of heresy.
Columnist Hamad al-Majed also criticized the show in the Asharq al-Awsat newspaper, saying that in its attempt to ridicule extremism the series also disrespected Islamic traditions and made generalizations, especially about Saudi Arabia.
Al-Qasabi told the AP he views his acting career as his own form of "jihad" — which in Islam literally means any struggle in the path to God.
"Offering something positive that raises awareness of issues, I see this as jihad," he said. "Jihad is that you raise your children well. Jihad is that you work and are on a path to doing things well. Jihad is that you are good at your work ... Life is one great jihad."
Al-Qasabi and al-Harbi are no strangers to controversy. They both worked on "Tash ma Tash", a long-running comedy that ruffled feathers for its handling of sensitive issues in Saudi society.
Al-Harbi says he wanted to kick it up a notch with "Selfie." He explained the title, saying the show is trying to give a snapshot of Arab society today.
"Selfie's" biggest success, said al-Harbi, is in exposing how extremist groups manipulate religion. He said the show delivered that message to the Arab public more effectively than lectures or government-controlled newspapers.

"I felt this is a weapon that will reach the audience," he said. "If it was just something comical, we would have focused on easy societal issues that aren't dangerous and are guaranteed safe."

Monday, July 06, 2015

7/7 - 10 years on

Public service workers. Highly trained. Selfless. Living legends.
The immensity of my respect has no words.

Worryingly, 10 years on, the mayor and government have seen it appropriate to close down police stations and fire stations, increasing pressures on public transport staff, and slowly, but progressively having their way with the NHS.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/lightbox/the-heroes-of-7-7-slideshow/heroes-of-7-7-photo-1436178345571.html

Metropolitan Police Constable Elizabeth Kenworthy was an off-duty PC travelling in the fourth carriage of the train that was blown up at Aldgate in the 7/7 bombings and is credited with saving two peoples lives. (Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images)
Heroes of 7/7


Her abiding memory of the day was of people coming out of surrounding buildings with cups of tea and offers of help.


Heroes of 7/7

Police Sergeant Shane Joshua is pictured outside New Scotland Yard on June 24, 2015 in London, England. As a Police Constable he was sent to Kings Cross to deal with the 7/7 bombings. (Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images)

Heroes of 7/7

Sergeant Joshua's abiding memory of the day was the strength of human spirit shown by the people affected.

Heroes of 7/7



Craig Cassidy was the first paramedic to arrive at the scene at Aldgate Station as he was driving past at the time on on his way to another job. He believed at first that their had been a train crash. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

Heroes of 7/7

He remembers: "How well everyone came together. Not just the emergency services but the public as well: really showing the true spirit of the UK and London. They showed that we won't be cowed by murderers. The underlining thing is that you knock us down, we will always get back up."

Heroes of 7/7

Stephen Hockin, a firefighter, poses for a portrait at Chelsea Fire Station on July 3, 2015 in London, England. Stephen was Crew Manager and was sent to Edgware Road Underground Station. (Photo by Rob Stothard/Getty Images)
Heroes of 7/7

His abiding memory of the day is "feeling a sense of pride in witnessing people's unselfish behaviour and risking their own lives to help strangers."
Heroes of 7/7

Gary Stevens, Access Manager for London Underground, poses for a portrait at Russell Square Underground Station on July 1, 2015 in London, England. Gary was station manager at Russell Square Underground Station on the day. (Photo by Rob Stothard/Getty Images)

Heroes of 7/7

He remembers: "the badness and the goodness that humanity brought to London on 7/7. The badness being the bombs that went off and the goodness being the Russell Square Station staff who far exceeded what was expected of them on the day."
Heroes of 7/7

PC Ashley Walker poses for a protrait at the site of the 7/7 bus bomb in Tavistock Square on June 19, 2015 in London, England. PC Walker was first on the scene at Tavistock. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

Heroes of 7/7

"The first thing I remember about the explosion was the sound, like a large thud, the popping of 1,000 balloons" he says.

Heroes of 7/7

Eoin Stuart-Walker, a paramedic, poses for a portrait at Aldgate Underground Station on July 3, 2015 in London, England. Eoin was a paramedic sent to Aldgate Underground Station. (Photo by Rob Stothard/Getty Images)

Heroes of 7/7
He remembers, "the smell of burning flesh and the heat whilst dealing with the large number of patients in one of the most difficult clinical situations of my life."

Heroes of 7/7

Firefighter Cem Cam is pictured outside Dowgate Fire Station on June 25, 2015 in London, England. The temporary watch manager was sent to Edgware Road underground station. (Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images)

Heroes of 7/7

Cam's abiding memory of the day was realising that the attacks would change London into a more security conscious city.

Heroes of 7/7


Detective Sergeant Louise Rochester, a PC at the time of the attack, poses for a portrait at Holborn Police Station on June 19, 2015 in London, England. DS Rochester was first on the scene at Russell Square. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

Heroes of 7/7

"One of my abiding memories is being driven back from the scene and seeing masses of people walking home because there was no transport" she says.
Heroes of 7/7