Tuesday, January 24, 2012

'Keeping It Secret as the Family Car Becomes a Home '

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/02/us/02cars.html?8hpib

Published: April 2, 2006

FAIRFAX, Va. — After being evicted from his apartment last year, Larry Chaney lived in his car for five months in Erie, Pa. As he passed the time at local cafes, he always put a ring of old house keys and several envelopes with bills on the table to give the impression that he had a home like everyone else.

Related Anya Peters, who has been living in her car in London since August, started a blog where she discusses her daily struggles.

While Michelle Kennedy was living in her car with her three children in Belfast, Me., she parked someplace different each night so no one would notice them, and she instructed the children to tell anyone who asked that they were "staying with friends."

Last year, William R. Alford started keeping a car cover over the station wagon where he sleeps. "I originally just had drapes, but the condensation on the inside of the windows was a dead giveaway," said Mr. Alford, who has been homeless here in Fairfax since May 2005.

As with all homeless people, finding food, warmth and a place to clean up is a constant struggle. But for those who live in their cars, remaining inconspicuous is its own challenge, and though living this way is illegal in most places, experts and advocates believe it is a growing trend.

"It's most often the working poor who find themselves in this situation, teetering on the border between the possessed and the dispossessed," said Kim Hopper, a researcher on homelessness for the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, which is based in New York.

The number of "mobile homeless," as they are often called, tends to climb whenever the cost of housing outpaces wages, Dr. Hopper said. Last year was the first year on record, according to an annual study conducted by the National Low Income Housing Coalition, that a full-time worker at minimum wage could not afford a one-bedroom apartment anywhere in the country at average market rates.

In 2001, officials in Lynnwood, Wash., a suburb of Seattle, passed an ordinance imposing penalties of 90 days in jail or fines of up to $1,000 against people caught living in their cars.

Peter Van Giesen, a code enforcement officer for the town, said that up to 20 cars a night were found with people parking near a park where there were complaints of people using the bushes as a restroom.

"Most of these people were trying to find work," Mr. Van Giesen said.

Living inside their last major possession, the mobile homeless have often just fallen on hard times, advocates and social workers say, and since they are more likely to view their situation as temporary, they are also more inclined to keep it secret.

Though the average duration of homelessness is four months, it tends to be shorter for the mobile homeless, experts say.

"You spend a lot of effort just trying to pass," said Ms. Kennedy, a former Senate page who wrote a book, "Without a Net: Middle Class and Homeless (with Kids) in America" (Viking Adult, 2005), about her experiences being homeless for several months in 1997 after her marriage fell apart. But residing — and hiding — in plain sight takes guile, and that starts with deciding where to park.

In cities, steep streets with no sidewalks, no overlooking windows and adjacent to woods are ideal because they have the least foot traffic and offer the easiest ability to enter and exit the car unnoticed, according to many who have been through the experience.

The best location is one sparse enough to avoid nosy onlookers but populated enough that the car does not stand out, they say, near enough to walk to a restroom but far enough to avoid passers-by. Parking lots of big-box retailers are a popular choice. If free, hospital parking lots are also an option. Guards often take pity when told that you are waiting to visit a sick spouse, many say.

Finding a place to shower can take ingenuity.

"The key is to be smart about when you enter and leave the building," said Randy Brown, who for the last three months while living in his car has been sneaking onto a college campus near where he waits tables in Fredericksburg, Va., and using a shower that security guards do not realize is publicly accessible.

Like several others interviewed, Mr. Chaney said that when he lost his trucking business after Hurricane Katrina and was evicted from his home, he was lucky enough to have already paid for a yearlong gym membership.

"That was probably the most important thing I had for keeping up appearances," said Mr. Chaney, who moved to Pennsylvania to be near his son, who was in college there.

Mr. Chaney said that while he looked for work, he did not reveal his situation to his son, who was going to school on a basketball scholarship, because he did not want to become a distraction.

While pride is usually the motivation for not telling friends or family, worries about the law and harassment are more often the reason people give for keeping their situation hidden. Safety is also a concern, advocates say, since homeless people are frequently targets for crime and physical abuse.

"A lot of what people do to keep the secret sounds paranoid, and some of it probably is," said Michele Wakin, who wrote her doctoral dissertation about people living in their vehicles in California and who is now a professor of sociology at Bridgewater State College in Massachusetts. "But when you're trying to be discreet and you're spending a lot of time in one area, little things get noticed."

People often develop severe back problems because they resist reclining their seat while sleeping, Ms. Wakin said. If questioned, they wanted to be able to tell the police that they were just napping, she added. People also built elaborate compartments in their cars, she said, to hide bedding.

Mr. Alford said he had learned to move slowly to avoid attracting attention by rocking the car when he was inside. When he has a lot of items to take from his car to the library where he spends much of his time, he makes several trips rather than load his arms and seem like a "bag lady," he said.

"It might seem crazy, but the stakes are pretty high in the suburbs when it comes to staying invisible because it's supposed to be sanitized out here," said Mr. Alford, who works occasionally as a Web developer. "People call 911 in the city to report seeing a homeless person, and the cops laugh. Out here, the cops are out the door in no time when that call comes in."

Experts say there are 2.1 million to 3.5 million homeless people nationally. Ms. Wakin said that the vigilance required to live in a car was one reason there tended to be fewer people who are drug addicted or mentally disabled living in their cars, compared with those living on street grates.

"Keeping the car in working order with the license, registration up to date, figuring out an address where offices can send things, and all the while trying to stay off the radar of police and neighbors becomes like a full-time job," Ms. Wakin said.

For some, secrecy can be an obstacle to needed services.

Richard Pyne, who was evicted from his home after losing his job at a factory in North Philadelphia, said he did not seek help because he feared losing custody of his 17-year-old daughter, Kristinlyn, who was living in their car with his wife, Suzanne, and him.

Last April, a social worker noticed the family asleep in the car at a park, and after explaining their rights, the worker persuaded them to move into a shelter.

The strain of constantly finding a place to wash up and the stress of avoiding detection became unbearable, Mr. Pyne said, adding, "You have no idea how exhausting it gets to survive like this."

'Mecca for the rich: Islam's holiest site 'turning into Vegas' '

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/mecca-for-the-rich-islams-holiest-site-turning-into-vegas-2360114.html?fb_action_ids=10150596115593659&fb_action_types=news.reads&fb_source=other_multiline#access_token=AAADWQ6323IoBAPhdu49ZC2I3CZBMlInQfxKv8SZCBf8YqNlPoRYPmOxnVY63djU8EtLcuTmYpqvIDQKGS0u5G8929UPWljPJwR2DAriwwZDZD&expires_in=5055


Historic and culturally important landmarks are being destroyed to make way for luxury hotels and malls, reports Jerome Taylor

Jerome Taylor

Behind closed doors – in places where the religious police cannot listen in – residents of Mecca are beginning to refer to their city as Las Vegas, and the moniker is not a compliment.

Click HERE to download graphic: Mecca For The Rich (430.39kB)

Over the past 10 years the holiest site in Islam has undergone a huge transformation, one that has divided opinion among Muslims all over the world.

Once a dusty desert town struggling to cope with the ever-increasing number of pilgrims arriving for the annual Hajj, the city now soars above its surroundings with a glittering array of skyscrapers, shopping malls and luxury hotels.

To the al-Saud monarchy, Mecca is their vision of the future – a steel and concrete metropolis built on the proceeds of enormous oil wealth that showcases their national pride.

Yet growing numbers of citizens, particularly those living in the two holy cities of Mecca and Medina, have looked on aghast as the nation's archaeological heritage is trampled under a construction mania backed by hardline clerics who preach against the preservation of their own heritage. Mecca, once a place where the Prophet Mohamed insisted all Muslims would be equal, has become a playground for the rich, critics say, where naked capitalism has usurped spirituality as the city's raison d'ĂȘtre.

Few are willing to discuss their fears openly because of the risks associated with criticising official policy in the authoritarian kingdom. And, with the exceptions of Turkey and Iran, fellow Muslim nations have largely held their tongues for fear of of a diplomatic fallout and restrictions on their citizens' pilgrimage visas. Western archaeologists are silent out of fear that the few sites they are allowed access to will be closed to them.

But a number of prominent Saudi archaeologists and historians are speaking up in the belief that the opportunity to save Saudi Arabia's remaining historical sites is closing fast.

"No one has the balls to stand up and condemn this cultural vandalism," says Dr Irfan al-Alawi who, as executive director of the Islamic Heritage Research Foundation, has fought in vain to protect his country's historical sites. "We have already lost 400-500 sites. I just hope it's not too late to turn things around."

Sami Angawi, a renowned Saudi expert on the region's Islamic architecture, is equally concerned. "This is an absolute contradiction to the nature of Mecca and the sacredness of the house of God," he told the Reuters news agency earlier this year. "Both [Mecca and Medina] are historically almost finished. You do not find anything except skyscrapers."

Dr Alawi's most pressing concern is the planned £690m expansion of the Grand Mosque, the most sacred site in Islam which contains the Kaaba – the black stone cube built by Ibrahim (Abraham) that Muslims face when they pray.

Construction officially began earlier this month with the country's Justice Minister, Mohammed al-Eissa, exclaiming that the project would respect "the sacredness and glory of the location, which calls for the highest care and attention of the servants or Islam and Muslims".

The 400,000 square metre development is being built to accommodate an extra 1.2 million pilgrims each year and will turn the Grand Mosque into the largest religious structure in the world. But the Islamic Heritage Foundation has compiled a list of key historical sites that they believe are now at risk from the ongoing development of Mecca, including the old Ottoman and Abbasi sections of the Grand Mosque, the house where the Prophet Mohamed was born and the house where his paternal uncle Hamza grew up.

There is little argument that Mecca and Medina desperately need infrastructure development. Twelve million pilgrims visit the cities every year with the numbers expected to increase to 17 million by 2025.

But critics fear that the desire to expand the pilgrimage sites has allowed the authorities to ride roughshod over the area's cultural heritage. The Washington-based Gulf Institute estimates that 95 per cent of Mecca's millennium-old buildings have been demolished in the past two decades alone.

The destruction has been aided by Wahabism, the austere interpretation of Islam that has served as the kingdom's official religion ever since the al-Sauds rose to power across the Arabian Peninsula in the 19th century.

In the eyes of Wahabis, historical sites and shrines encourage "shirq" – the sin of idolatry or polytheism – and should be destroyed. When the al-Saud tribes swept through Mecca in the 1920s, the first thing they did was lay waste to cemeteries holding many of Islam's important figures. They have been destroying the country's heritage ever since. Of the three sites the Saudis have allowed the UN to designate World Heritage Sites, none are related to Islam.

Those circling the Kaaba only need to look skywards to see the latest example of the Saudi monarchy's insatiable appetite for architectural bling. At 1,972ft, the Royal Mecca Clock Tower, opened earlier this year, soars over the surrounding Grand Mosque, part of an enormous development of skyscrapers that will house five-star hotels for the minority of pilgrims rich enough to afford them.

To build the skyscraper city, the authorities dynamited an entire mountain and the Ottoman era Ajyad Fortress that lay on top of it. At the other end of the Grand Mosque complex, the house of the Prophet's first wife Khadijah has been turned into a toilet block. The fate of the house he was born in is uncertain. Also planned for demolition are the Grand Mosque's Ottoman columns which dare to contain the names of the Prophet's companions, something hardline Wahabis detest.

For ordinary Meccans living in the mainly Ottoman-era town houses that make up much of what remains of the old city, development often means the loss of their family home.

Non-Muslims cannot visit Mecca and Medina, but The Independent was able to interview a number of citizens who expressed discontent over the way their town was changing. One young woman whose father recently had his house bulldozed described how her family was still waiting for compensation. "There was very little warning; they just came and told him that the house had to be bulldozed," she said.

Another Meccan added: "If a prince of a member of the royal family wants to extend his palace he just does it. No one talks about it in public though. There's such a climate of fear."

Dr Alawi hopes the international community will finally begin to wake up to what is happening in the cradle of Islam. "We would never allow someone to destroy the Pyramids, so why are we letting Islam's history disappear?"

Under Threat

Bayt al-Mawlid

When the Wahabis took Mecca in the 1920s they destroyed the dome on top of the house where the Prophet Mohammed was born. It was thenused as a cattle market before being turned into a library after a campaign by Meccans. There are concerns that the expansion of the Grand Mosque will destroy it once more. The site has never been excavated by archaeologists.

Ottoman and Abasi columns of the Grand Mosque

Slated for demolition as part of the Grand Mosque expansion, these intricately carved columns date back to the 17th century and are the oldest surviving sections of Islam's holiest site. Much to the chagrin of Wahabis, they are inscribed with the names of the Prophet's companions. Ottomon Mecca is now rapidly disappearing

Al-Masjid al-Nawabi

For many years, hardline Wahabi clerics have had their sites set on the 15th century green dome that rests above the tomb holding the Prophet, Abu Bakr and Umar in Medina. The mosque is regarded as the second holiest site in Islam. Wahabis, however, believe marked graves are idolatrous. A pamphlet published in 2007 by the Saudi Ministry of Islamic Affairs, endorsed by Abdulaziz Al Sheikh, the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, stated that "the green dome shall be demolished and the three graves flattened in the Prophet's Masjid".

Jabal al-Nour

A mountain outside Mecca where Mohammed received his first Koranic revelations. The Prophet used to spend long spells in a cave called Hira. The cave is particularly popular among South Asian pilgrims who have carved steps up to its entrance and adorned the walls with graffiti. Religious hardliners are keen to dissuade pilgrims from congregating there and have mooted the idea of removing the steps and even destroying the mountain altogether.

'right to be forgotton'

http://blogs.wsj.com/tech-europe/2012/01/23/reding-details-sweeping-changes-to-e-u-data-laws/

Wall Street Journal blog

Reding Details Sweeping Changes to EU Data Laws

Getty Images
Reding: Companies must report data losses within 24 hours.

MUNICH — European Commission proposals over the strict handling of data will give European companies a competitive advantage in the world, said EU Commissioner Viviane Reding.

“Personal data is the currency of today’s digital market,” the European commissioner for justice told delegates at the DLD conference in Munich. “And like any currency, it needs stability and trust. Only if consumers can ‘trust’ that their data is well protected, will they continue to entrust businesses and authorities with it, buy online, and accept new services.”

In a bill to be published Wednesday, Ms. Reding aims to reform comprehensively European data regulations, eliminate red tape and save €2.3 billion in costs. Her proposals would see a pan-European regulation, replacing the existing patchwork of 27 national codes, as well as giving citizens the right to control their data, including the right “to be forgotten.”

“A company will have to comply with one law for the whole of the EU territory. It will only have to deal with one single data protection authority. It will be the data protection authority of the member state in which the company has its main establishment. It will not matter anymore which data protection authority deals with a case. All data protection authorities in whatever EU country will have the same adequate tools and powers to enforce EU-law.”

She calls for the establishment of clear rules for international data transfers.

“It seems odd that data held by a European company is adequately protected whilst it is inside the borders of the European Union, but not when it is transferred to a different part of that same company in Asia or South America.

“In the Internet age, data protection laws need to take account of this global dimension. If they only focus on the activities of a company within a given country, they will not reflect reality.

“I therefore want to improve the current system of binding corporate rules to make these exchanges less burdensome and more secure.”

Ms. Reding outlined her proposals for how European citizens would be able to control their data.

“First, people need to be informed about the processing of their data in simple and clear language. Internet users must be told which data is collected, for what purposes and how long it will be stored. They need to know how it might be used by third parties. They must know their rights and which authority to address if those rights are violated.

“Second, whenever users give their agreement to the processing of their data, it has to be meaningful. In short, people’s consent needs to be specific and given explicitly.

“Thirdly, the reform will give individuals better control over their own data. I will include easier access to one’s own data in the new rules. People must be able to easily take their data to another provider or have it deleted if they no longer want it to be used.”

This last point includes the controversial, “right to be forgotten,” which some commentators have seen as an attempt to change history. What Ms. Reding proposes is any data that a user has given to site should be able to be recalled. She stressed that it was not about deleting content from archives.

“The right to be forgotten is of course not an absolute right. There are cases where there is a legitimate and legally justified interest to keep data in a data base. The archives of a newspaper are a good example. It is clear that the right to be forgotten cannot amount to a right of the total erasure of history. Neither must the right to be forgotten take precedence over freedom of expression or freedom of the media.”

And in a clear swipe at the tardiness with which some companies have delayed informing users of breaches of their data, Ms. Reding’s proposals would require companies that suffer a data leak to inform the data protection authorities and the individuals concerned, and they must do so without undue delay.

“As a general rule, without undue delay means for me within 24 hours,” she said.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

SOPA and PIPA


Wikipedia blackout protesting against and raising awareness of SOPA and PIPA:

'For over a decade, we have spent millions of hours building the largest encyclopedia in human history. Right now, the U.S. Congress is considering legislation that could fatally damage the free and open Internet. For 24 hours, to raise awareness, we are blacking out Wikipedia'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Learn_more



http://lifeaftersopa.cheezburger.com/

Monday, January 16, 2012

funny how old ideas come back...

... and seem completely new!

http://www.confettidirect.co.uk/about_us.html

dried petals as confetti.

'John Lewis and a new vision for capitalism'

This year looks set to be the one when all three major political parties compete to be the standard-bearers of “responsible capitalism”.

Ed Miliband may have claimed this territory first, in his Labour Party conference speech distinguishing “producer” from “predatory” businesses. But the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats are now developing their own strategies for claiming this cause.

The ownership of businesses is a crucial element of this. Miliband used the example of Southern Cross (Berlin: 4SO.BE - news) , a care-home business bought out by a private equity fund, to illustrate “predatory” capitalism. David Cameron has talked about empowering plc shareholders in order to restrict executive pay. More responsible and engaged forms of ownership are rightly viewed as a basis for a more sustainable business culture.

Employee ownership can make a significant contribution in this respect. But it has largely figured in public-policy debate as a possible model for public-service delivery, not for private enterprise. It is odd that there has been so much talk of “John Lewises” in the public sector, and so little of “John Lewises” in the private sector, even though the latter are worth an estimated £30bn to the UK economy. There are also far more of these firms than the emphasis on John Lewis suggests, including Arup engineers, Make architects and Scott Bader chemical manufacturers.

The ownership model is particularly well suited to medium-sized enterprises, which often struggle with business succession when their founders retire. Many of these businesses face a choice between family ownership (which typically fails within two to three generations), private equity ownership or being gobbled up by a competitor.

As I argue in a new report published tomorrow by the Employee Ownership Association, All Of Our Business, there are two types of business value that will be crucial to the renewal of the British economy in the future. And both are integral to how employee-owned firms operate.

The first is greater emphasis on patience. The complaint that shareholder-owned firms are excessively short-termist has been around for many years. But the urgency of addressing this has grown as a result of the financial crisis. There is a sense that many businesses have become primarily geared around maximising the earnings of a small group of elites who run, advise and finance them. A relentless focus on short-term share-price fluctuations means financial strategy often predominates over long-term value creation.

How can firms resist this temptation to focus on immediate monetary returns, at the expense of longer-term productive purpose? Employee-ownership solves this problem, because the owners are engaged in the day-to-day workings of the business, at all levels from top to bottom. Employee-owners are rewarded with dividends, but they can see the benefit of investing for the long term and delayed gratification.

Committed for the long term, employee-owners will see the benefit of investment in research and development, to an extent that external shareholders and private equity funds typically don’t. Staff turnover is also lower. The entire orientation of the business culture is towards long-term horizons.

The second value which needs to be at the heart of responsible capitalism is well-being. Stress is now the single biggest cause of absence from work, having recently overtaken repetitive strain injury. The Government’s own research shows health-related absence from work now costs the UK economy a staggering £100bn a year, of which a third is related to unhappiness and stress.

Research conducted by Napier University Business School compared various indicators of well-being in employee-owned firms with existing data from businesses elsewhere. It found that well- being was higher in the employee-owned sector, by various measures, such as intention to change jobs and sick leave taken.

This chimes with everything else that is known about employee engagement and what makes work enjoyable. What makes for a good job is being recognised, being consulted and operating in a culture of fairness and openness. Giving people real voice and ownership is a crucial bargaining tool, if employers want to get the best out of people.

Responsible capitalism will not be achieved through employee-ownership alone. But there are ample opportunities for growth in this area, which the Government, business lobby and business schools ought to recognise and act on. If we want to move beyond the era of short-term earnings maximisation the Government needs to champion alternatives, if necessary through legislative and tax changes.

It is time that political and business leaders spoke up for a vision of business as something other than just a money-making vehicle.

William Davies is academic director of The Centre for Mutual and Employee-Owned Business, University of Oxford. All Of Our Business: Why Britain Needs More Private Sector Employee Ownership is published tomorrow by the Employee Ownership Association at www.employeeownershipassociation.co.uk

http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/john-lewis-vision-capitalism-195617070.html

Sunday, January 15, 2012

'Attacks on scientists to be condemned - U.N. chief'

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/attacks-scientists-condemned-u-n-chief-031238916.html

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said on Friday any killing like that of an Iranian nuclear scientist in Tehran earlier this week was to be condemned, a U.N. spokesman said.

Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan, 32, was killed by a motorbike hitman who put a magnetic bomb on his car on a street near a Tehran university during the morning rush hour on Wednesday.

Iran, at odds with Western governments over its nuclear program, has accused U.S. and Israeli agents of being behind the killing.

"Any terrorist action or assassination of any people, whether scientist or civilian, is to be condemned. It is not acceptable. Human rights must be protected," U.N. spokesman Eduardo del Buey quoted Ban as saying.

He said the U.N. chief was speaking to media accompanying him on a trip to Lebanon.

Earlier this week, Iran's U.N. Ambassador Mohammad Khazaee sent a letter to Ban and the U.N. Security Council urging them to condemn the latest assassination, which it described as an act of terrorism.

U.N. diplomats said the 15-nation Security Council was unlikely to take up the issue and condemn the killing.

The murder of Ahmadi-Roshan was the fifth daylight attack in two years on technical experts involved in Iran's nuclear program, which Western countries believe is aimed at producing an atomic weapon but Tehran says is for peaceful purposes.

The United States has denied involvement in the killing and condemned it. Israel has declined to comment.

(Reporting By Patrick Worsnip; Editing by John O'Callaghan)

Saturday, January 14, 2012

'The Rise of the New Groupthink'

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/opinion/sunday/the-rise-of-the-new-groupthink.html?src=me&ref=general

SOLITUDE is out of fashion. Our companies, our schools and our culture are in thrall to an idea I call the New Groupthink, which holds that creativity and achievement come from an oddly gregarious place. Most of us now work in teams, in offices without walls, for managers who prize people skills above all. Lone geniuses are out. Collaboration is in.

But there’s a problem with this view. Research strongly suggests that people are more creative when they enjoy privacy and freedom from interruption. And the most spectacularly creative people in many fields are often introverted, according to studies by the psychologists Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Gregory Feist. They’re extroverted enough to exchange and advance ideas, but see themselves as independent and individualistic. They’re not joiners by nature.

One explanation for these findings is that introverts are comfortable working alone — and solitude is a catalyst to innovation. As the influential psychologist Hans Eysenck observed, introversion fosters creativity by “concentrating the mind on the tasks in hand, and preventing the dissipation of energy on social and sexual matters unrelated to work.” In other words, a person sitting quietly under a tree in the backyard, while everyone else is clinking glasses on the patio, is more likely to have an apple land on his head. (Newton was one of the world’s great introverts: William Wordsworth described him as “A mind for ever/ Voyaging through strange seas of Thought, alone.”)

Solitude has long been associated with creativity and transcendence. “Without great solitude, no serious work is possible,” Picasso said. A central narrative of many religions is the seeker — Moses, Jesus, Buddha — who goes off by himself and brings profound insights back to the community.

Culturally, we’re often so dazzled by charisma that we overlook the quiet part of the creative process. Consider Apple. In the wake of Steve Jobs’s death, we’ve seen a profusion of myths about the company’s success. Most focus on Mr. Jobs’s supernatural magnetism and tend to ignore the other crucial figure in Apple’s creation: a kindly, introverted engineering wizard, Steve Wozniak, who toiled alone on a beloved invention, the personal computer.

Rewind to March 1975: Mr. Wozniak believes the world would be a better place if everyone had a user-friendly computer. This seems a distant dream — most computers are still the size of minivans, and many times as pricey. But Mr. Wozniak meets a simpatico band of engineers that call themselves the Homebrew Computer Club. The Homebrewers are excited about a primitive new machine called the Altair 8800. Mr. Wozniak is inspired, and immediately begins work on his own magical version of a computer. Three months later, he unveils his amazing creation for his friend, Steve Jobs. Mr. Wozniak wants to give his invention away free, but Mr. Jobs persuades him to co-found Apple Computer.

The story of Apple’s origin speaks to the power of collaboration. Mr. Wozniak wouldn’t have been catalyzed by the Altair but for the kindred spirits of Homebrew. And he’d never have started Apple without Mr. Jobs.

But it’s also a story of solo spirit. If you look at how Mr. Wozniak got the work done — the sheer hard work of creating something from nothing — he did it alone. Late at night, all by himself.

Intentionally so. In his memoir, Mr. Wozniak offers this guidance to aspiring inventors:

“Most inventors and engineers I’ve met are like me ... they live in their heads. They’re almost like artists. In fact, the very best of them are artists. And artists work best alone .... I’m going to give you some advice that might be hard to take. That advice is: Work alone... Not on a committee. Not on a team.”

And yet. The New Groupthink has overtaken our workplaces, our schools and our religious institutions. Anyone who has ever needed noise-canceling headphones in her own office or marked an online calendar with a fake meeting in order to escape yet another real one knows what I’m talking about. Virtually all American workers now spend time on teams and some 70 percent inhabit open-plan offices, in which no one has “a room of one’s own.” During the last decades, the average amount of space allotted to each employee shrank 300 square feet, from 500 square feet in the 1970s to 200 square feet in 2010.

Our schools have also been transformed by the New Groupthink. Today, elementary school classrooms are commonly arranged in pods of desks, the better to foster group learning. Even subjects like math and creative writing are often taught as committee projects. In one fourth-grade classroom I visited in New York City, students engaged in group work were forbidden to ask a question unless every member of the group had the very same question.

The New Groupthink also shapes some of our most influential religious institutions. Many mega-churches feature extracurricular groups organized around every conceivable activity, from parenting to skateboarding to real estate, and expect worshipers to join in. They also emphasize a theatrical style of worship — loving Jesus out loud, for all the congregation to see. “Often the role of a pastor seems closer to that of church cruise director than to the traditional roles of spiritual friend and counselor,” said Adam McHugh, an evangelical pastor and author of “Introverts in the Church.”

SOME teamwork is fine and offers a fun, stimulating, useful way to exchange ideas, manage information and build trust.

But it’s one thing to associate with a group in which each member works autonomously on his piece of the puzzle; it’s another to be corralled into endless meetings or conference calls conducted in offices that afford no respite from the noise and gaze of co-workers. Studies show that open-plan offices make workers hostile, insecure and distracted. They’re also more likely to suffer from high blood pressure, stress, the flu and exhaustion. And people whose work is interrupted make 50 percent more mistakes and take twice as long to finish it.

Many introverts seem to know this instinctively, and resist being herded together. Backbone Entertainment, a video game development company in Emeryville, Calif., initially used an open-plan office, but found that its game developers, many of whom were introverts, were unhappy. “It was one big warehouse space, with just tables, no walls, and everyone could see each other,” recalled Mike Mika, the former creative director. “We switched over to cubicles and were worried about it — you’d think in a creative environment that people would hate that. But it turns out they prefer having nooks and crannies they can hide away in and just be away from everybody.”

Privacy also makes us productive. In a fascinating study known as the Coding War Games, consultants Tom DeMarco and Timothy Lister compared the work of more than 600 computer programmers at 92 companies. They found that people from the same companies performed at roughly the same level — but that there was an enormous performance gap between organizations. What distinguished programmers at the top-performing companies wasn’t greater experience or better pay. It was how much privacy, personal workspace and freedom from interruption they enjoyed. Sixty-two percent of the best performers said their workspace was sufficiently private compared with only 19 percent of the worst performers. Seventy-six percent of the worst programmers but only 38 percent of the best said that they were often interrupted needlessly.

Solitude can even help us learn. According to research on expert performance by the psychologist Anders Ericsson, the best way to master a field is to work on the task that’s most demanding for you personally. And often the best way to do this is alone. Only then, Mr. Ericsson told me, can you “go directly to the part that’s challenging to you. If you want to improve, you have to be the one who generates the move. Imagine a group class — you’re the one generating the move only a small percentage of the time.”

Conversely, brainstorming sessions are one of the worst possible ways to stimulate creativity. The brainchild of a charismatic advertising executive named Alex Osborn who believed that groups produced better ideas than individuals, workplace brainstorming sessions came into vogue in the 1950s. “The quantitative results of group brainstorming are beyond question,” Mr. Osborn wrote. “One group produced 45 suggestions for a home-appliance promotion, 56 ideas for a money-raising campaign, 124 ideas on how to sell more blankets.”

But decades of research show that individuals almost always perform better than groups in both quality and quantity, and group performance gets worse as group size increases. The “evidence from science suggests that business people must be insane to use brainstorming groups,” wrote the organizational psychologist Adrian Furnham. “If you have talented and motivated people, they should be encouraged to work alone when creativity or efficiency is the highest priority.”

The reasons brainstorming fails are instructive for other forms of group work, too. People in groups tend to sit back and let others do the work; they instinctively mimic others’ opinions and lose sight of their own; and, often succumb to peer pressure. The Emory University neuroscientist Gregory Berns found that when we take a stance different from the group’s, we activate the amygdala, a small organ in the brain associated with the fear of rejection. Professor Berns calls this “the pain of independence.”

The one important exception to this dismal record is electronic brainstorming, where large groups outperform individuals; and the larger the group the better. The protection of the screen mitigates many problems of group work. This is why the Internet has yielded such wondrous collective creations. Marcel Proust called reading a “miracle of communication in the midst of solitude,” and that’s what the Internet is, too. It’s a place where we can be alone together — and this is precisely what gives it power.

MY point is not that man is an island. Life is meaningless without love, trust and friendship.

And I’m not suggesting that we abolish teamwork. Indeed, recent studies suggest that influential academic work is increasingly conducted by teams rather than by individuals. (Although teams whose members collaborate remotely, from separate universities, appear to be the most influential of all.) The problems we face in science, economics and many other fields are more complex than ever before, and we’ll need to stand on one another’s shoulders if we can possibly hope to solve them.

But even if the problems are different, human nature remains the same. And most humans have two contradictory impulses: we love and need one another, yet we crave privacy and autonomy.

To harness the energy that fuels both these drives, we need to move beyond the New Groupthink and embrace a more nuanced approach to creativity and learning. Our offices should encourage casual, cafe-style interactions, but allow people to disappear into personalized, private spaces when they want to be alone. Our schools should teach children to work with others, but also to work on their own for sustained periods of time. And we must recognize that introverts like Steve Wozniak need extra quiet and privacy to do their best work.

Before Mr. Wozniak started Apple, he designed calculators at Hewlett-Packard, a job he loved partly because HP made it easy to chat with his colleagues. Every day at 10 a.m. and 2 p.m., management wheeled in doughnuts and coffee, and people could socialize and swap ideas. What distinguished these interactions was how low-key they were. For Mr. Wozniak, collaboration meant the ability to share a doughnut and a brainwave with his laid-back, poorly dressed colleagues — who minded not a whit when he disappeared into his cubicle to get the real work done.

Race Remixed - New York Times

For Many Latinos, Racial Identity Is More Culture Than Color

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/14/us/for-many-latinos-race-is-more-culture-than-color.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=general

Every decade, the Census Bureau spends billions of dollars and deploys hundreds of thousands of workers to get an accurate portrait of the American population. Among the questions on the census form is one about race, with 15 choices, including “some other race.”

More than 18 million Latinos checked this “other” box in the 2010 census, up from 14.9 million in 2000. It was an indicator of the sharp disconnect between how Latinos view themselves and how the government wants to count them. Many Latinos argue that the country’s race categories — indeed, the government’s very conception of identity — do not fit them.

The main reason for the split is that the census categorizes people by race, which typically refers to a set of common physical traits. But Latinos, as a group in this country, tend to identify themselves more by their ethnicity, meaning a shared set of cultural traits, like language or customs.

So when they encounter the census, they see one question that asks them whether they identify themselves as having Hispanic ethnic origins and many answer it as their main identifier. But then there is another question, asking them about their race, because, as the census guide notes, “people of Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin may be of any race,” and more than a third of Latinos check “other.”

This argument over identity has gained momentum with the growth of the Latino population, which in 2010 stood at more than 50 million. Census Bureau officials have acknowledged that the questionnaire has a problem, and say they are wrestling with how to get more Latinos to pick a race. In 2010, they tested different wording in questions and last year they held focus groups, with a report on the research scheduled to be released by this summer.

Some experts say officials are right to go back to the drawing table. “Whenever you have people who can’t find themselves in the question, it’s a bad question,” said Mary C. Waters, a sociology professor at Harvard who specializes in the challenges of measuring race and ethnicity.

The problem is more than academic — the census data on race serves many purposes, including determining the makeup of voting districts, and monitoring discriminatory practices in hiring and racial disparities in education and health. When respondents do not choose a race, the Census Bureau assigns them one, based on factors like the racial makeup of their neighborhood, inevitably leading to a less accurate count.

Latinos, who make up close to 20 percent of the American population, generally hold a fundamentally different view of race. Many Latinos say they are too racially mixed to settle on one of the government-sanctioned standard races — white, black, American Indian, Alaska native, native Hawaiian, and a collection of Asian and Pacific Island backgrounds.

Some regard white or black as separate demographic groups from Latino. Still others say Latinos are already the equivalent of another race in this country, defined by a shared set of challenges.

“The issues within the Latino community — language, immigration status — do not take into account race,” said Peter L. Cedeño, 43, a lawyer and native New Yorker born to Dominican immigrants. “We share the same hurdles.”

At a time when many multiracial Americans are proudly asserting their mixed-race identity, many Latinos, an overwhelmingly blended population with Indian, European, African and other roots, are sidestepping or ignoring questions of race.

Erica Lubliner, who has fair skin and green eyes — legacies of her Jewish father and her Mexican mother — said she was so “conflicted” about the race question on the census form that she left it blank.

Ms. Lubliner, a recent graduate of the medical school at the University of California, Los Angeles, in her mid-30s, was only 9 when her father died, and she grew up steeped in the language and culture of her mother. She said she has never identified with “the dominant culture of white.” She believes her mother is a mix of white and Indian. “Believe me, I am not a confused person,” she said. “I know who I am, but I don’t necessarily fit the categories well.”

Alejandro Farias, 23, from Brownsville, Tex., a supervisor for a freight company, sees himself simply as Latino. His ancestors came from the United States, Mexico and Portugal. When pressed, he checked “some other race.”

“Race to me gets very confusing because we have so many people from so many races that make up our genealogical tree,” he said.

Yet race matters. How Latinos identify themselves — and how the census counts them — affects the political clout of Latinos and other minority groups. Some studies have found that African-Latinos tend to be significantly more supportive of government-sponsored health care and much less supportive of the death penalty than Latinos who identify as white, a rift that is also found in the broader white and black populations.

This racial effect “weakens the political effectiveness of Latinos as a group,” said Gary M. Segura, a political science professor at Stanford who has conducted some of the research.

A majority of Latinos identify themselves as white. Among them is Fiordaliza A. Rodriguez, 40, a New York lawyer who says she considers herself white because “I am light-skinned” and that is how she is viewed in her native Dominican Republic.

But she says there is no question that she is seen as different from the white majority in this country. Ms. Rodriguez recalled an occasion in a courtroom when a white lawyer assumed she was the court interpreter. She surmised the confusion had to do with ethnic stereotyping, “no matter how well you’re dressed.”

Some of the latest research, however, shows that many Latinos — like Irish and Italian immigrants before them — drop the Latino label to call themselves simply “white.” A study published last year in the Journal of Labor Economics found that the parents of more than a quarter of third-generation children with Mexican ancestry do not identify their children as Latino on census forms.

Most of this ethnic attrition occurs among the offspring of parents or grandparents married to non-Mexicans, usually non-Hispanic whites. These Latinos tend to have high education, high earnings and high levels of English fluency. That means that many successful Latinos are no longer present in statistics tracking Latino economic and social progress across generations, hence many studies showing little or no progress for third-generation Mexican immigrants, said Stephen J. Trejo, an economist at the University of Texas at Austin and co-author of the study.

And a more recent study by University of Southern California researchers found that more than two million people, or 6 percent of those who claimed any type of Latin American ancestry on census surveys, did not ultimately identify as Latino or Hispanic. The trend was more prevalent among those of mixed parentage, who spoke only English and who identified as white, black or Asian when asked their race.

James Paine, whose father is half Mexican-American, said it never occurred to him to claim a Latino identity. Mr. Paine, 25, the owner of a real estate investment management company in La Jolla, Calif., spent summers with his Mexican-American aunt and attends his father’s big family reunions every year (his mother is white of Irish and French descent). But he says he does not speak Spanish or live in a Latino neighborhood.

“If the question is ‘What’s your heritage?’ I’d say Irish-Mexican,” he said. “But the question is ‘What are you?’ and the answer is I’m white.”

On the other side of the spectrum are black Latinos, who say they feel the sting of racism much the same as other blacks. A sense of racial pride has been emerging among many black Latinos who are now coming together in conferences and organizations.

Miriam Jimenez Roman, 60, a scholar on race and ethnicity in New York, says that issues like racial profiling of indigenous-looking and dark-skinned Latinos led her to appear in a 30-second public service announcement before the 2010 census encouraging Latinos of African descent to “check both: Latino and black.” “When you sit on the subway, you just see a black person, and that’s really what determines the treatment,” she said. The 2010 census showed 1.2 million Latinos who identified as black, or 2.5 percent of the Hispanic population.

Over the decades, the Census Bureau has repeatedly altered how it asks the race question, and on the 2010 form, it added a sentence spelling out that “Hispanic origins are not races.” The change helped steer 5 percent more Latinos away from “some other race,” with the vast majority of those choosing the white category.

Still, critics of the census questionnaire say the government must move on from racial distinctions based on 18th-century binary thinking and adapt to Americans’ sense of self.

But Latino political leaders say the risk in changing the questions could create confusion and lead some Latinos not to mark their ethnicity, shrinking the overall Hispanic numbers.

Ultimately, said Angelo Falcon, president of the National Institute for Latino Policy and chairman of the Census Advisory Committee on the Hispanic Population, this is not just a tussle over identity, it is a political battle, too.

“It comes down to what yields the largest numbers for which group,” he said.


Monday, January 09, 2012

New Year!











Mutts

'The lesson of the railways: private is not always best'

http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/01/04/the-lesson-of-the-railways-private-is-not-always-best/

The lesson of the railways: private is not always best

The Independent newspaper blog
  • By Ben Chu
  • Wednesday, 4 January 2012 at 11:55 am

In my Indy column today I mention that the public subsidy to the railways has increased in real terms since the days of British Rail. For those who are interested, this chart from Sir Roy McNulty’s report on the railways from last year shows in greater detail how the public cost has exploded:

Untitled 13 The lesson of the railways: private is not always best

The orange bars are the subsidy.

As the McNulty report points out, one of the main objectives of rail privatisation in 1993 under John Major’s government was to reduce the level of public subsidy. That particular train is not just late, it’s heading in the wrong direction.

What we have here is a lesson for those tempted to assume that wholesale privatisation of public services always produces greater efficiency and reduces public expenditure. McNulty says the British railway system is around 30 per cent less efficient than publicly controlled European peers.

And why are our railways so inefficient?

This passage from McNulty (p28) suggests an explanation:

“Differences in performance gains between Great Britain and these European examples may result from differences in the approach taken to franchising. While Great Britain has franchised all services, franchising in Europe has tended to focus largely on subsidised regional services, with main-line services continuing to be operated by the former state monopoly. This has allowed new franchised operators some flexibility over staffing, with staff given the opportunity to transfer to the new operators or remain with the state incumbent…It has allowed new operators to improve labour productivity and therefore reduce overall costs.”

In other words, while a modicum of privatisation can be a public benefit, there can also be large public benefits from keeping key services in the hands of the state.

Monday, December 19, 2011

“Our Unusual Christmas Day”

From Yahoo features
http://uk.lifestyle.yahoo.com/%E2%80%9Cour-unusual-christmas-day%E2%80%9D.html

By Natalie Blenford – Tue, Dec 13, 2011 18:23 GMT

Forget turkey and all the trimmings at three o’clock: four people tell us about their unusual plans for Christmas day.

The nurse

ChloĂ« Gillen, 23, is a Staff Nurse in the Parrot Ward at Great Ormond Street hospital in London. She’ll be working from 7.30am to 8.30pm on Christmas day, and has worked on Christmas day for the past two years

“I’ll be looking after sick children at Great Ormond Street”

“I’ll get up at 6am on Christmas day and slip out of my house in South-East London before any of my family are awake. I’ll drive to Great Ormond Street, park the car and be on the Ward by 7.30am.

The children in my ward are being treated for neurological conditions such as brain tumours and some of them are terminally ill, but there’s always a festive atmosphere on Christmas day. Last year, the Fire Brigade came down with toys; a choir popped in to sing carols and the consultants brought their kids into the hospital too. Loads of relatives come down to celebrate with their children, so it will definitely be a full-house!

I help give Christmas stockings out at 8am – we make one for every child – and we help them unwrap their presents. We never do planned surgery on Christmas day, but last year there were a few emergency operations, and if this happens again, I’ll spend most of my shift giving antibiotics intravenously and monitoring post-operative patients. It can be busy and very intense.

I’ll grab a 45-minute lunch break anytime between one and six o’clock. The canteen lays on a Christmas buffet and we get a free voucher so we don’t have to pay, but it’s not as nice as a home-cooked dinner! The last hour of my shift will be spent writing reports, and then I’ll say goodbye to the kids at 8.30pm.

I’ll be home by 9pm, and usually my family is still sitting at the table eating Christmas dinner as they don’t start until 7.30pm. There are 15 people coming over to my parent’s house this year, including my boyfriend, so I’ll grab a plate of food, heat it up and join them.

My mum will start fussing over me, making sure I’ve got enough to eat, and then we’ll open presents. They wait all day to open theirs so we can all do it together, which is very sweet. I’m usually exhausted and will fall asleep on the sofa by 11pm. I’ll have worked 40 hours in three days by Christmas night, so I’m looking forward to Boxing Day which I have off!

My Christmas is definitely unusual, but it gives me a lot of perspective on my own life. I see other people’s reality, which makes me feel lucky. And my family are so proud of me for working in this job, which is really rewarding too.”

The non-Christian family

Esti and David Cook live in Hertfordshire with their three children, Elliot, 18, Shelley, 16 and Joel, 12. Because they’re Jewish, they don’t celebrate Christmas, although they borrow some of the more fun traditions…

“We’ll be lighting Chanukah candles before having Christmas lunch”

Esti says: “We’re a Jewish family and I’ve got my son’s Barmitzvah next year, so we don’t make a big deal out of Christmas, but we get together as a family and enjoy a festive meal.

My brother and his children come over to our house, we have an indulgent gathering with lots of wine, crackers and lovely food.

We like the romanticism of Christmas – the lights, the cards – but we don’t wake up on Christmas morning and say ‘happy Christmas everybody!’

The Jewish festival of Chanukah lasts for eight days and this year it coincides with Christmas, so we’ll light Chanukah candles before we sit down for dinner, once it gets dark. We’ll sing a special Chanukah song, and then maybe Shelley will get a present!

After dinner, we’ll take the dog for a walk and then watch Eastenders, Downton Abbey and all the other Christmas specials. Then we’ll all crawl up to bed about 11pm.

From a religious point of view, the day means nothing to us, but we live in England which is a Christian country, so of course we’re going to join in a little bit. As Shelley says, Christmas is everywhere so we just embrace it.”

Shelley says: “This year, I’ll wake up at 9am and run into my parent’s room to see if they’ve got me a present. I usually get my presents for Chanukah instead – but this year the two festivals coincide day so I’m hoping mum and dad will make an exception!

We’ll watch TV and have a big Christmas breakfast of eggs, sausages and muffins, then I’ll lay the table very nicely with Christmas crackers. I love crackers, and I’m sure that’s the one thing that that every single family has.

We’ll have dinner – maybe a kosher turkey, or salmon with roast potatoes, and then we’ll watch more TV.

I do feel envious of people who celebrate Christmas properly – it’s a nice thing to do, it’s cute. I like everything to do with Christmas. I love the decorations, lights and family time. I do Secret Santa with my Jewish girl friends and I really want a tree in my room!

Overall, I think Christmas has an effect on everyone, irrespective of whether you are religious. There’s always the Christmas spirit around.”

The volunteer

Charlotte Blyth, 37, a practise manager from Crystal Palace, will be volunteering for Crisis, the national charity for single homeless people, on Christmas day. She manages the Crisis at Christmas centre at Deptford Reach in South-East London and will welcome approximately 120 guests on Christmas day.

“I’ll be making Christmas Day special for 120 homeless people”

“I’ve volunteered with Crisis at Christmas for the past ten years and I always work on December 25th. I’m up at 5.30am and at the centre by 7am, and I manage a team of 35 volunteers. My day starts with a team briefing at 7am. A lot of the volunteers are first-timers, so I explain that we can have anything from 15 to 120 guests coming to the centre, and that it’s our job to give them a special Christmas experience.

After the briefing, we get to work. We cook breakfast, buy newspapers, open the IT suite, set up the arts and crafts areas and get the Bingo ready. The first guests arrive at 8am, and our visiting experts come shortly afterwards. We have doctors, masseuses, hairdressers, piano players and choirs – they all donate their time to make our guests feel special.

At 12.30, we start cooking lunch. Crisis goes through 4,000 loaves of bread over the Christmas period – there is a lot of cooking to do! My shift finishes at 3pm, and I spend the next hour handing over to the night manager and doing a de-brief.

If I’m not too tired, I’ll drive out to Hertfordshire to see my dad and my sisters for the evening, but often I just go home to Crystal Palace and collapse. Volunteers are too busy to think about giving each other presents on Christmas day, but we do have a big get-together after Christmas where we celebrate properly.

I work at Crisis every day from 22nd to 30th December – I take annual leave from my job to be able to do this. But I don’t see it as a sacrifice at all.

I’m not the sort of person who can sit down and eat a box of chocolates and watch Eastenders – that’s not me. Christmas is about giving and the best thing you can give is your time. Honestly, this is the most rewarding job in the world and I’d miss it so much if I didn’t do it every year.”

Saturday, December 17, 2011

Kids react: Bullying

A YouTube series that shows a group of children viral videos, and records their reaction. This episode was of more serious nature than their usual programs. I am struck by the maturity of the children.

If any child is getting bullied, and happens to read this:
As cliched as it sounds - do not suffer alone. You are not the first, and unfortunately, nor will you be the last to be bullied. Tell someone. Someone you trust. Different people will deal with bullying in different ways. For a few years in school I was bullied. It was awful. I felt like it would never end. I told teachers, which meant it stopped for a while, then would restart. I wish I went to different teachers. It only ended when I answered back (thanking them for their taunts - that they didn't expect). Now these are memories from a previous time. You will get over it.

More importantly, if you are witness to bullying, do not stay silent. Your silence contributes to the bullying. You are in a position of power. Your silence gives the bullies power to continue what they are doing to whoever they wish. But your voice will take away this power. Speak up. Tell a teacher in private. They won't say who told, and you maintain your anonimity, and thus prevent this from occuring.

If you are the bully. Take a long hard look at yourself. You may be hurting. Or hurting others may temporalily make you feel better about your self. But I'll warn, life has a funny way - what goes around, comes around. There is nothing brave, big or remotely popular about being mean. Others will dislike you for it, and will forever remember you in a bad way. You do not need to be like that. Being nice doesn't mean being weak. It just means being nice. You will feel good about yourself when you are caring and polite towards others. It's hard work to get that point from where you are now. You will need to rebuild trust with others. But in the long run, is well worth it.

And if a teacher is reading this - take bullying seriously. Those 'little' disagreements are part of a bigger picture, having a long term impact on the children in front of you. They will carry through those memories and experieces into adulthood. You are in a position of great responsibility helping to raise society's next generation of young adults. Some of my best teachers instilled a sense of social responsibility in myself and my peers. Some of my worst teachers took no interest in even the teaching itself.

Sunday, December 04, 2011

UK govt plans to release patient healthcare records to private companies

Dear UK govt,

An essential part of healthcare provision is the guarantee of confidentiality. This principle stems centuries. Patient data is not a 'product'. It is not available wholesale to be sold to the highest bidder. It is confidential personal information. It does not belong to anyone other than the individual in question. This information is given to a health care provider in confidence, and with the understanding that this personal information is used to help the individual patient. That personal information is not to be utilised for any other purpose.

If the patient is informed about a specific research, and they actively choose to be a part of this specific research, and they give informed consent specifically for this purpose, then it is ethical for their personal information to be used for that specific research, and solely for that research. This system already exists.

I stress, healthcare is not a business. It is a service. Hence, National Health Service - not National Health Business. The 'Facebook' approach to personal information is not an ethical approach. I hope those in government have enough common sense to realise this. If they do not have the sense to realise this, I hope those in the legal and justice profession would be kind enough to explain this to the politicians.

Kind regards,

A Doctor


The article below

NHS Records Access For Life Science Firm

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/nhs-records-access-life-science-firms-034859906.html

NHS patient records would be shared with private health care companies including firms which test on animals under new government plans.

David Cameron will promise closer links between the health service and the life science sector in a speech tomorrow.

The Prime Minister is expected to say that the controversial industry could become a powerhouse of the British economy if regulation can be eased.

It currently has an annual turnover of £50bn and already employs 160,000 people across 4,500 companies.

It is thought the proposals would also give private firms more freedom to run clinical trials inside NHS hospitals.

However patients' groups are unlikely to support the move amid concerns about confidentiality and the security of people's details.

A government spokesman said all efforts would be made to protect the privacy of patients:

"The life sciences industry is of vital importance to the UK economy and we are committed to greater collaboration with the NHS to ensure that patients can get faster access to valuable treatments.

"All necessary safeguards would be in place to ensure protection of patients' details - the data will be anonymised and the process will be carefully and robustly regulated.

"Healthcare charities, researchers and clinicians are calling for this action in order to improve research, innovation and the development of medicines in the UK."

The decision is also likely to be unpopular with animal rights groups who would be unhappy with firms who test on animals being granted access to NHS information.

Mr Cameron's speech is also expected to outline plans to grant cancer sufferers and other seriously ill patients early access to new drugs before they are fully licensed.

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Mixed Brittania...

The links...



A fantastic set of programmes - available on BBC iPlayer. This is history that is not officially taught, and often just whitewashed out of memory. Mr Alagiah, and the team behind these programmes - thank you for such an intelligent, well researched and brilliantly presented series.

Saturday, October 15, 2011

'Gucci workers 'tortured' during shifts'

The Telegraph

'Employees of luxury goods manufacturer Gucci were subject to "torture", being made to stand for 14 hours a day, pay for goods stolen by customers and being forced to ask for toilet breaks.


6:01PM BST 14 Oct 2011


Allegations of the demeaning treatment at a Gucci outlet in Shenzhen have led to two managers being replaced.

In an open letter, workers at the Gucci outlet said the cruel behaviour extended to pregnant employees not being allowed food or water during their shifts.

"It was a kind of torture for us to stand for more than 14 hours a day," the letter detailed. "No short rest, water or food was allowed even for a pregnant employee."

The abuse was so severe it was claimed some workers suffered miscarriages as a result.

Gucci, owned by giant French group Pinault-Printemps-Redoute, said it had engaged external experts to conduct a review of what had happened. The Chinese city of Shenzhen is also understood to be investigating what had occurred.

The allegations against Gucci included staff having overtime pay withheld. The five signatories of the letter, all of whom have left the company, claimed they were owed thousands of dollars in unpaid wages. They said their managers, both of whom have left the company, refused to pay overtime despite keeping them in the store until 2am some nights to undertake stock controls.

When items were stolen from the store the staff had to pay out for their replacements despite the thefts being covered by insurance, the letter claimed.

A spokesman for Gucci said: "Gucci has proactively engaged external consultants to conduct a comprehensive review to support ongoing actions that can enhance our organisational structure, the welfare and training of our people, talent recruitment and retention and other business practices in China."

The allegations against Gucci come against a backdrop of workplace abuse and poor working conditions. Foxconn, the technology group that makes components for Apple's iPhone, suffered a string of suicides among workers thought to be related to working conditions.'

Friday, October 14, 2011

Highly recommended film...

Skin - currently on BBC iplayer - so watch it online while you can.
Based on the true story of Sandra Laing. Born to white Africaans parents, but her appearance was mixed race - all during apartheid era South Africa.

Makes one angry to think what humans do to each other.

Monday, October 03, 2011

BBC programme 'Mixed Britannia'

This could be interesting and informative.

'Nearly 100 years ago, Chinese seaman Stanley Ah Foo arrived in Liverpool to start a new life. He soon fell in love - but laws at the time meant that his English bride, Emily, was only able to marry if she gave up her British nationality and became a so-called alien herself.
In Mixed Britannia - a new three-part series for BBC 2 - George Alagiah explores the often untold stories of Britain's mixed-race communities. He met Stanley and Emily Ah Foo's daughters, Doreen and Lynne, who told the remarkable story of how their parents met, and the restrictions placed upon them'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14990721

Sunday, October 02, 2011

'Bahrain Protest Doctors Tell Of Torture'

'Two doctors who are facing jail for treating anti-government protesters in Bahrain have told Sky News how they were tortured by the authorities.
Surgeon Dr Ghassan Dhaif and his wife Dr Zarhra Al Sammak, an anaesthetist, have received prison terms of 15 and five years respectively.
They were among a group of 20 medical staff sentenced by a military court after being accused of stealing medicine, stockpiling weapons and occupying a hospital.
Dr Dhaif told Sky: "These charges are not realistic, they were brought in without any evidence.
"The only evidence that they have was from the person in charge of the interrogation and he himself has been accused of torturing all the medics and also the other people whom he interrogated.
"The whole process was completely illegal."
Dr Dhaif described the torture they were subjected to following their arrests: "These interrogations were completely carried out under severe torture.
"All of us were subjected to massive torture and this torture going on from kicks, using sticks, using a plastic hose, using plastic bottles, using shoes."
The couple are expecting to be summoned by the court, before beginning their prison sentences, at any time.
Their lawyers are appealing against the jail terms but Dr Al Sammak said she is "not very optimistic".
She said: "They blindfolded us and forced us to sign confessions, we don't know what was written on those and they are taking those confessions as the main evidence against us."
The charges followed an uprising in the Gulf state in February and March which was violently halted with the help of troops from Saudi Arabia.
Protests against the Sunni rulers came amid accusations by a Shia Muslim majority of discrimination in access to state jobs, healthcare and homes.
Human rights groups condemned the sentences with Amnesty International accusing authorities of putting the doctors on trial because some had criticised the violent crackdown on protesters.'

Via

Saturday, October 01, 2011

Tea!

I'm a big fan of good tea. I'm also a big fan of beautiful animation. This Twining's advert has combined both.

I can also confirm that Twining's does produce rather good tea. I recommend the loose leaf variety properly brewed. But then, I do also like Whittard's, Punjana, Swan... I could go on...

But the advert is lovely!

All those young folk on their bicycles...

Wow! Their skills are incredible! I can't begin to imagine the amount to time and effort spent on gaining and developing those skills.




via howithappened.com

Thoughtful statistics: Selection Bias

Taken from the blog of John Cook. The thinking behind the decision making is important, and something that is often forgotton. When looking at the population sample, it is important to consider the sizeable portion of the population that do not feature in the sample.
Obviously - no approval for killing machines.

'Selection bias and bombers

by John on January 21, 2008
During WWII, statistician Abraham Wald was asked to help the British decide where to add armor to their bombers. After analyzing the records, he recommended adding more armor to the places where there was no damage!
This seems backward at first, but Wald realized his data came from bombers that survived. That is, the British were only able to analyze the bombers that returned to England; those that were shot down over enemy territory were not part of their sample. These bombers’ wounds showed where they could afford to be hit. Said another way, the undamaged areas on the survivors showed where the lost planes must have been hit because the planes hit in those areas did not return from their missions.
Wald assumed that the bullets were fired randomly, that no one could accurately aim for a particular part of the bomber. Instead they aimed in the general direction of the plane and sometimes got lucky. So, for example, if Wald saw that more bombers in his sample had bullet holes in the middle of the wings, he did not conclude that Nazis liked to aim for the middle of wings. He assumed that there must have been about as many bombers with bullet holes in every other part of the plane but that those with holes elsewhere were not part of his sample because they had been shot down.'

From : http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2008/01/21/selection-bias-and-bombers
via: howithappened.com

Thursday, September 01, 2011

Reasons not to be on Facebook

Six Reasons Why I’m Not On Facebook, By Wired UK’s Editor

David Rowan
September 18, 2010

“David, you’re sounding like an old dude!” Matt Flannery, who runs social-lending website Kiva, couldn’t understand when I explained that, no, I wouldn’t be keeping in touch with him via Facebook. “What are you worried about?” he teased in a break at the PINC conference in Holland. “Only old guys get worked up about privacy.”

Well, Matt, I admit I’m the wrong side of 30, and that I still avoid using emoticons in formal correspondence. But let me explain why I’m not active on Facebook, nor sharing my credit-card purchases on Blippy, nor allowing Google Buzz to mine my contacts list, nor even publishing my DNA on 23andMe.com. My cautious use of the social networks has nothing to do with paranoia about privacy; and yes, I celebrate the unprecedented transparency and connectivity that these services can empower. But what’s increasingly bothering me is the wider social and political cost of our ever-greater enmeshment in these proprietary networks. Here are half a dozen reasons why.

1) Private companies aren’t motivated by your best interests
Facebook and Google exist to make money, by selling advertisers the means to target you with ever greater precision. That explains the endless series of “privacy” headlines, as these unregulated businesses push boundaries to make it easier for paying third parties to access your likes, interests, photos, social connections and purchasing intentions. That’s why Facebook has made it harder for users to understand exactly what they’re giving away — why, for instance, its privacy policy has grown from 1,004 words in 2005 to 5,830 words today (by comparison, as the New York Times has pointed out, the U.S. Constitution is 4,543). Founder Mark Zuckerberg once joked dismissively about the “dumb fucks” who “trust me”. I admire the business Zuckerberg’s built; but I don’t trust him.

2) They make it harder to reinvent yourself
“When you’re young, you make mistakes and you do some stupid stuff,” President Obama warned high-school students in Virginia last September. “Be careful about what you post on Facebook, because in the YouTube age whatever you do will be pulled up later somewhere in your life.” He’s right: anything posted online might come to haunt you permanently, yet all of us need space to grow. As the writer Jaron Lanier said in a recent lecture, if Robert Zimmerman, of small-town Hibbing, Minnesota, had had a Facebook profile, could he really have re-created himself as the New York beatnik Bob Dylan

3) Information you supply for one purpose will invariably be used for another …
Phone up to buy a pizza, and the order-taker’s computer gives her access to your voting record, employment history, library loans — all “just wired into the system” for your convenience. She’ll suggest a tofu pizza as she knows about your 42-inch waist, she’ll add a delivery surcharge because a nearby robbery yesterday puts you in “an orange zone” — and she’ll be on her guard because you’ve checked out the library book Dealing With Depression. This is where the American Council for Civil Liberties sees consumerism going — watch its pizza video online — and it’s not to hard to believe. Already surveys suggest that 35 percent of firms are rejecting applicants because of information found on social networks. What makes you think you can control what happens to your personal data?

4) … and there’s a good chance it will be used against you
Mark Zuckerberg would like to suggest that, in an ever more transparent world, “you have one identity — the days of you having a different image for your work friends or co-workers and for the other people you know are probably coming to an end pretty quickly.” That suits his purpose — but in our multi-layered lives it’s just not true. A vindictive ex-partner, or a workplace rival, or a health insurer, or a political opponent, may selectively expose information to your detriment – powerfully re-framing your identity in a way you would consider dishonest.

5) People screw up, and give away more than they realise
To understand how much personal information Facebook users are inadvertently sharing, visit youropenbook.org and search for phrases such as “cheated on my wife” or “my new mobile number is” or “feeling horny“. I’ll bet that most of the people whose intimate details you’ll get to read are unaware that their updates are being shared quite so openly. Have they genuinely given Zuckerberg their informed consent?

6) And besides, why should we let businesses privatize our social discourse?
Some day you should take time to read those 5,830 words: it’s Facebook that owns the rights to do as it pleases with your data, and to sell access to it to whoever is willing to pay. Yes, it’s free to join — but with half a billion of us now using it to connect, it’s worth asking ourselves how far this “social utility” (its own term) is really acting in the best interests of society.

Don’t take my word, Matt — young internet users themselves are increasingly wary of the social networks’ use of their private data. A recent study by the Pew Internet and American Life Project — a decent sample of some 2,253 Americans — found that 44 percent of Generation Y (aged 18 to 29) now limit their online personal information, compared with 33 percent of internet users between ages 30 to 49. And three-quarters of younger social-networkers have adjusted their privacy settings to limit what they share.

Call me uncool — but that’s a trend I’m happy to share with my friends. In person.

David Rowan is the editor of Wired UK magazine. He also writes The Digital Life, a monthly tech column in our sister Conde Nast magazine, GQ. This column originally appeared in CG’s September issue.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

A take on the simple life...

From the Hufffington Post

4 Misconceptions About the Simple Life

Posted: 8/27/11 11:38 AM ET

Duane Elgin

It is important to recognize inaccurate stereotypes about the simple life because they make it seem impractical and ill suited for responding to increasingly critical breakdowns in world systems. Four misconceptions about the simple life are so common they deserve special attention. These are equating simplicity with: poverty, moving back to the land, living without beauty and economic stagnation.

1.Simplicity Means Poverty
Although some spiritual traditions have advocated a life of extreme renunciation, it is very misleading to equate simplicity with poverty. Poverty is involuntary and debilitating, whereas simplicity is voluntary and enabling. A life of conscious simplicity can have both a beauty and a functional integrity that elevates the human spirit.
Poverty fosters a sense of helplessness, passivity and despair, whereas purposeful simplicity fosters a sense of personal empowerment, creative engagement and opportunity. Historically, those choosing a simpler life have sought the golden mean -- a creative and aesthetic balance between poverty and excess. Instead of placing primary emphasis on material riches, they have sought to develop, with balance, the invisible wealth of experiential riches.

2.Simplicity Means Rural Living
In the popular imagination there is a tendency to equate the simple life with Thoreau's cabin in the woods by Walden Pond and to assume that people must live an isolated and rural existence. Interestingly, Thoreau was not a hermit during his stay at Walden Pond. His famous cabin was roughly a mile from the town of Concord, and every day or two he would walk into town. His cabin was so close to a nearby highway that he could smell the pipe smoke of passing travelers.

Thoreau wrote that he had "more visitors while I lived in the woods than any other period of my life." The romanticized image of rural living does not fit the modern reality, as a majority of persons choosing a life of conscious simplicity do not live in the backwoods or rural settings; they live in cities and suburbs. While green living brings with it a reverence for nature, it does not require moving to a rural setting. Instead of a "back to the land" movement, it is much more accurate to describe this as a "make the most of wherever you are" movement. Increasingly that means adapting ourselves creatively to a rapidly changing world in the context of big cities and suburbs.

3.Simplicity Means Living Without Beauty
The simple life is sometimes viewed as an approach to living that advocates a barren plainness and denies the value of beauty and aesthetics. While the Puritans, for example, were suspicious of the arts, most advocates of simplicity have seen it as essential for revealing the natural beauty of things.

Many who adopt a simpler life would surely agree with Pablo Picasso, who said, "Art is the elimination of the unnecessary." Leonardo da Vinci wrote that, "Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." Frederic Chopin wrote that, "Simplicity is the final achievement ... the crowning reward of art."

The influential architect Frank Lloyd Wright was an advocate of an "organic simplicity" that integrates function with beauty and eliminates the superfluous. In his architecture a building's interior and exterior blend into an organic whole, and the building, in turn, blends harmoniously with the natural environment. Rather than involving a denial of beauty, simplicity liberates the aesthetic sense by freeing things from artificial encumbrances. From a spiritual perspective, simplicity removes the obscuring clutter and discloses the life-energy that infuses all things.

4.Simplicity Means Economic Stagnation
Some worry that if a significant number of people simplify their lives it will reduce demand for consumer goods and, in turn, produce unemployment and economic stagnation. While it is true that the level and patterns of personal consumption would shift in a society that values green living, a robust economy can flourish that embraces sustainability.

Although the consumer sector and material goods would contract, the service and public sectors would expand dramatically. When we look at the world, we see a huge number of unmet needs: caring for elderly, restoring the environment, educating illiterate and unskilled youth, repairing decaying roads and infrastructure, providing health care, creating community markets and local enterprises, retrofitting the urban landscape for sustainability and many more. Because there are an enormous number of unmet needs, there are an equally large number of purposeful and satisfying jobs waiting to get done. There will be no shortage of employment opportunities in an Earth-friendly economy.


A central and exciting task for our times is consciously designing ourselves into a sustainable and meaningful future, from the personal level outwards. In envisioning what this future could look like, it is important to not be bound by old stereotypes and to instead see the realism and the beauty of simpler ways of living.